Mondelez International
Packaged foodNot measured in this run.
Mondelez International scores 43.5 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 42 of 120 companies measured in the run of 5 October 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.
Visibility is uneven across models: Gemini scores it 54.0 while ChatGPT scores it 33.0, a gap of 21.0 points. A brand that is strong on one model and weak on another has a different problem from one that is mid-table everywhere.
Gemini names Mondelez International in 63% of answers and places it early enough to score 16% on prominence; ChatGPT names it in 29%.
Across the 24-prompt panel there are 3 prompts where at least one model does not name Mondelez International at all — those are the answers a competitor is winning instead, and the table below shows which.
Measured inside packaged food rather than the wide consumer goods pool, Mondelez International scores 80.5 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.
Prompt performance
Position when mentionedHead to head
Who the models name more often, side by side.
Is this you?
Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.
Request an audit — $299Ranked either side
Consumer, nearest on the index.
Questions about this score
What is Mondelez International's AI visibility score?
Mondelez International scores 43.5 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 42 of 120 companies, measured on 5 October 2026 across ChatGPT and Gemini.
Which AI model mentions Mondelez International most?
Gemini, at 54.0 out of 100, naming Mondelez International in 63% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.
How is Mondelez International's score measured?
With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name Mondelez International, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.